iCAD/CAEt
Carnegie Mellon
University

24-688: Introduction to CAD/CAE Tools

PS9   
  Fall 2013   

Home ] Course Info ] Schedule ] Showcase ] References ] Performance ]
     

 

PS9 Total                                  
Total 100.00                                  
Average 92.59 1.00 1.00 66.70 61.17 0.08 54.61 49.92 0.09 67.93 80.14 -0.18 0.98 0.97 0.93 0.92 0.97  
    Baseline       Revised Design  
    25.0 25.0     minus %*100 or -5 pts maximum     minus %*100 or -5 pts maximum     minus %*100 or -5 pts maximum 25 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25  
Codename Grade Current design simulation result submitted?            (1 = yes, 0 = no) txt file submitted? (1 = yes,     0 = no) Max torque soln - Worm Front Max torque stdnt - Worm front % difference Max torque soln - Worm Rear Max torque stdnt - Worm rear % difference Vertical Distance traveled soln Vertical Distance traveled stdnt % difference submitted .iaa revised file Simulation time (1 is < 2 secs more,0.5 = more than 2sec, 0 is no submission) Revised Max Torque Worm Front (1 = less than baseline, 0.75 = more than baseline, 0 no submission) Revised Max Torque Worm Rear (1 = less than baseline,0.75 = more than baseline 0 = no submission) Vertical Distance Traveled (1 = less than 10 mm loss, 0 = more than 10 mm loss) Comments
St. Paul , Minnesota 99.94 1 1 66.7 66.7 0.00% 54.61 54.6 0.02% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Columbus , Ohio 99.94 1 1 66.7 66.7 0.00% 54.61 54.6 0.02% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Tampa , Florida 99.94 1 1 66.7 66.7 0.00% 54.61 54.6 0.02% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Atlanta , Georgia 99.94 1 1 66.7 66.7 0.00% 54.61 54.6 0.02% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Raleigh , North Carolina 99.94 1 1 66.7 66.7 0.00% 54.61 54.6 0.02% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Arlington , Texas 99.62 1 1 66.7 66.59 0.16% 54.61 54.71 -0.18% 67.93 67.95 -0.04% 1 1 1 1 1 Wrong naming convention
Kansas , Missouri 99.29 1 1 66.7 66.58 0.18% 54.61 54.9 -0.52% 67.93 67.93 -0.01% 1 1 1 1 1  
Washington , DC 97.47 1 1 66.7 65.72 1.47% 54.61 54.04 1.05% 67.93 67.94 -0.01% 1 1 1 1 1  
Los Angeles , California 97.23 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.9 1.31% 67.93 68 -0.11% 1 1 1 1 1 Wrong naming convention
Austin , Texas 97.16 1 1 66.7 65.84 1.30% 54.61 53.77 1.54% 67.93 67.93 0.00% 1 1 1 1 1  
Norfolk , Virginia 97.15 1 1 66.7 65.84 1.30% 54.61 53.78 1.53% 67.93 67.94 -0.02% 1 1 1 1 1  
San Antonio , Texas 97.15 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.30% 54.61 53.78 1.53% 67.93 67.94 -0.01% 1 1 1 1 1  
Jersey , New Jersey 97.15 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.30% 54.61 53.78 1.53% 67.93 67.94 -0.01% 1 1 1 1 1  
Buffalo , New York 97.15 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.30% 54.61 53.78 1.53% 67.93 67.94 -0.01% 1 1 1 1 1  
Santa Ana , California 97.15 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.30% 54.61 53.78 1.53% 67.93 67.94 -0.01% 1 1 1 1 1  
Baton Rouge , Louisiana 97.15 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.30% 54.61 53.78 1.53% 67.93 67.94 -0.01% 1 1 1 1 1  
Virginia Beach , Virginia 97.15 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.30% 54.61 53.78 1.53% 67.93 67.94 -0.02% 1 1 1 1 1  
Minneapolis , Minnesota 97.14 1 1 66.7 65.74 1.44% 54.61 53.85 1.40% 67.93 67.94 -0.02% 1 1 1 1 1  
Anaheim , California 97.14 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 67.94 -0.02% 1 1 1 1 1  
Plano , Texas 97.13 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.31% 54.61 53.78 1.53% 67.93 67.95 -0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Jacksonville , Florida 97.12 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Denver , Colorado 97.12 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Phoenix , Arizona 97.12 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Baltimore , Maryland 97.12 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Portland , Oregon 97.12 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Toledo , Ohio 97.12 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Honolulu CDP, Hawaii 97.12 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Fremont , California 97.09 1 1 66.7 65.9 1.20% 54.61 53.7 1.67% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Glendale , Arizona 97.09 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.78 1.53% 67.93 67.9 0.04% 1 1 1 1 1  
Indianapolis, Indiana 96.93 1 1 66.7 65.68 1.53% 54.61 54.05 1.03% 67.93 68.27 -0.51% 1 1 1 1 1  
Louisville , Kentucky 96.60 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.30% 54.61 53.78 1.53% 67.93 67.54 0.57% 1 1 1 1 1  
Lincoln , Nebraska 96.60 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.30% 54.61 53.78 1.53% 67.93 67.54 0.57% 1 1 1 1 1  
Hialeah , Florida 96.59 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 67.54 0.57% 1 1 1 1 1  
Fresno , California 96.58 1 1 66.7 65.74 1.44% 54.61 53.84 1.42% 67.93 67.54 0.57% 1 1 1 1 1  
Seattle , Washington 96.53 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 67.5 0.63% 1 1 1 1 1  
Omaha , Nebraska 96.51 1 1 66.7 67.3 -0.90% 54.61 53.3 2.40% 67.93 67.8 0.18% 1 1 1 1 1  
Laredo , Texas 96.50 1 1 66.7 65.41 1.93% 54.61 53.77 1.54% 67.93 67.94 -0.02% 1 1 1 1 1  
Las Vegas , Nevada 96.20 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.31% 54.61 53.79 1.51% 67.93 67.26 0.98% 1 1 1 1 1  
Anchorage , Alaska 96.06 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.7 1.67% 67.93 67.3 0.92% 1 1 1 1 1  
St. Petersburg , Florida 95.88 1 1 66.7 65.74 1.44% 54.61 53.46 2.12% 67.93 67.54 0.57% 1 1 1 1 1  
New Orleans , Louisiana 94.98 1 1 66.7 66.7 0.01% 54.61 54.62 -0.02% 67.93 154.3 -127.19% 1 1 1 1 1 Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height
Boston , Massachusetts 93.95 1 1 66.7 66.69 0.02% 54.61 54.05 1.04% 67.93 154.3 -127.23% 1 1 1 1 1 Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height
Wichita , Kansas 93.33 1 1 66.7 66.79 -0.13% 54.61 51.14 6.35% 67.93 66.89 1.53% 1 1 1 1 1  
San Francisco , California 92.16 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 154.3 -127.16% 1 1 1 1 1 Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height
Milwaukee , Wisconsin 92.16 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 153.9 -126.57% 1 1 1 1 1 Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height
Tucson , Arizona 92.16 1 1 66.7 65.8 1.35% 54.61 53.8 1.49% 67.93 153.9 -126.57% 1 1 1 1 1 Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height
Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania 91.86 1 1 66.7 65.97 1.10% 54.61 55.73 -2.04% 67.93 150.2 -121.08% 1 1 1 1 1 Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height
Dallas , Texas 90.86 1 1 66.7 65.86 1.26% 54.61 53.73 1.62% 67.93 67.92 0.01% 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 day late,  Revised torque should not be larger than baseline torque
Mesa , Arizona 90.56 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.30% 54.61 40.43 25.97% 67.93 67.94 -0.01% 1 1 1 0.5 1  
St. Louis , Missouri 89.99 1 1 66.7 73.51 -10.20% 54.61 61.48 -12.57% 67.93 67.93 -0.01% 1 1 1 1 1  
Oakland , California 89.98 1 1 66.7 -23.8 135.63% 54.61 -35.8 165.60% 67.93 67.94 -0.02% 1 1 1 1 1 Negative torque? Revised torque should not be larger than baseline torque
Sacramento , California 89.95 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.31% 54.61 53.79 1.51% 67.93 67.26 0.98% 1 1 0.5 0.5 1  Revised torque should not be larger than baseline torque
Cleveland , Ohio 86.55 1 1 66.7 63.62 4.62% 54.61 56.71 -3.83% 67.93 155.4 -128.83% 1 1 1 1 1 Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height
Cincinnati , Ohio 85.00 1 1 66.7 14.8 77.81% 54.61 14.8 72.90% 67.93 154.2 -126.94% 1 1 1 1 1 Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height
El Paso , Texas 82.39 1 1 66.7 55.1 17.39% 54.61 65 -19.02% 67.93 67 1.36% 1 1 0.5 0.5 1  Revised torque should not be larger than baseline torque
Riverside , California 78.75 1 1 66.7 -23.8 135.68% 54.61 -35.8 165.55% 67.93 154.3 -127.16% 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 Need to calculate vertical distance traveled, not max height. Negative torque? Revised torque should not be larger than baseline torque
Fort Wayne , Indiana 60.00 1 1 66.7 80.25 -20.31% 54.61 80.25 -46.94% 67.93 25 63.19% 1 0 0 0 0 no revised design
Corpus Christi , Texas 42.18 1 1 66.7 65.83 1.30% 54.61 53.78 1.54% 67.93 64.54 4.98% 0 0 0 0 0 no revised design
Long Beach , California 29.05 1 1 66.7 3.34 94.99% 54.61 2.68 95.09% 67.93 67.28 0.95% 1 1 1 1 1 2 days late
Memphis , Tennessee 0.00 0 0 66.7     54.61     67.93     0 0 0 0 0 Not submitted
Stockton , California 0.00 0 0 66.7     54.61     67.93     0 0 0 0 0 Not submitted
Charlotte , North Carolina 0.00 0 0 66.7     54.61     67.93     1 0 0 0 0 Not submitted
Tacoma , Washington 0.00 1 1 66.7   100.00% 54.61   100.00% 67.93   100.00% 0 0 0 0 0 Not submitted
       


 

Home ] Course Info ] Schedule ] Showcase ] References ] Performance ]


Send email to Professor Kenji Shimada ( shimada @ cmu.edu)
with questions or comments about this web site.