This tutorial guides students through a structured LinkedIn network analysis using AI-assisted tools (Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT, or similar - just be cautious with your data) to diagnose their professional network positioning, identify strategic gaps, and develop a targeted network growth plan.
Module 2 of the final project: Professional Network Analysis (LinkedIn)
This is the first of five diagnostic modules that build toward your comprehensive leadership profile:
Tools Required:
Deliverable: Analysis + visuals for Section 2 of final project
By completing this analysis, students will be able to:
Step 1: Export Your LinkedIn Connections
Connections.csv fileExpected format:
First Name, Last Name, Email Address, Company, Position, Connected On
Important Notes:
Step 2: Upload to AI Tool and Initial Cleaning
Help me clean and analyze my LinkedIn Contacts.
To clean:
1) Clean names of special characters
2) Normalize Company names (e.g., "Amazon.com" → "Amazon",
"CMU" → "Carnegie Mellon University")
To analyze:
1) Count the number of contacts per Company and provide
the top 5 companies with the most contacts
2) Look up the top 10 companies and research what industries
they belong to
3) Count the unique job types by the number of contacts and
provide the top 5 job titles
What to Expect
Example Output Structure
| Rank | Company | Contacts |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon | 63 |
| 2 | Carnegie Mellon University - Tepper School of Business | 52 |
| 3 | Unknown | 40 |
| 4 | Carnegie Mellon University | 28 |
| 5 | Microsoft | 25 |
Interpretation Guide
| Pattern Observed | Implication |
|---|---|
| High concentration in one company | May indicate limited network diversity |
| Academic institutions dominant | Network may be research-focused |
| Tech companies clustering | Industry-specific network structure |
| Many “Unknown” entries | Data quality issues or unemployed/student contacts |
Key Questions to Ask:
Step 2.2: Industry Sector Classification
Prompt 2: Deep Industry Analysis
Show industry sectors for the top 10 companies in my network.
Use official classification systems like NAICS (North American Industry
Classification System) and GICS (Global Industry Classification Standard).
What to Expect
Example Output
| Company | NAICS | GICS | Sector |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon | 518210 | Internet & Direct Marketing Retail | Technology |
| Microsoft | 511210 | Software | Technology |
| PwC | 541611 | Professional Services | Consulting |
| Carnegie Mellon University | 611310 | Education Services | Education |
Career mobility: Tech-to-Finance transitions are harder than Tech-to-Tech
Information access: Homogeneous networks = redundant information
Opportunity risk: Over-concentration in declining industries
Step 2.3: Complete Sector Mapping
Generate a complete list of all unique normalized companies in my network and their respective sectors.
Provide this as a downloadable CSV file.
What to Expect
Action Item
Step 3: Network Composition Visualization
Create a visual summary of sector distribution in my network
(e.g., pie chart or bar chart).
Then provide insights on:
1) Which sectors dominate my network
2) Which sectors are underrepresented
3) What this distribution reveals about my network's strategic positioning
What to Expect
Example: Sector Distribution in Professional Network
| Sector Dominance | Implication | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| >50% in one sector | Deep industry embeddedness | Limited cross-industry mobility; echo chamber |
| Balanced across 4-5 sectors | Diverse information access | May lack depth in any single domain |
| Heavy in Education/Academia | Research-oriented network | May lack industry connections for commercialization |
Step 4: Ideal Network Composition
As a [YOUR ROLE: e.g., "MBA student interested in product management at tech companies" OR "consultant transitioning to venture capital"] What would be the ideal composition of LinkedIn contacts across industries?
Provide:
1) Recommended % distribution across sectors
2) Rationale for each sector
3) Key roles/titles I should prioritize in each sector
| Career Goal | Tech | Consulting | Finance | Target Industry | Academia | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tech PM | 40 | 10 | 5 | 30 | 15 | 0 |
| VC Investor | 30 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 10 | 0 |
| Healthcare Exec | 15 | 20 | 10 | 40 | 15 | 0 |
| Professor (R1) | 20 | 10 | 5 | 20 | 45 | 0 |
| Management Consultant | 20 | 35 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 10 |
Students should adapt the prompt to their specific goals:
Step 5: Gap Analysis & Recommendations
Create a visual comparison showing:
1) My CURRENT network composition by sector (%)
2) My IDEAL network composition by sector (%)
3) The GAP between current and ideal
Then provide actionable recommendations:
- Which sectors should I expand in
- Specific companies and roles to target
- LinkedIn strategies to close these gaps
- A 12-month network growth roadmap
Example: Current vs. Ideal Network Composition
| Sector | Current | Ideal | Gap | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | 45% | 40% | +5% | ⚠️ Overrepresented - Diversify away |
| Technology | 20% | 25% | -5% | ✅ Target: Add 50+ tech contacts |
| Policy/Nonprofit | 1% | 5% | -4% | ✅ Critical gap - Add 20+ contacts |
| Healthcare | 5% | 10% | -5% | ✅ Strategic priority - Add 30 contacts |
| Professional Services | 12% | 10% | +2% | ⚠️ Slight overweight |
| Financial Services | 8% | 5% | +3% | ⚠️ Slight overweight |
Underrepresented Sectors to Target:
Policy & Nonprofit (Critical Gap: -4%)
Healthcare (Moderate Gap: -3%)
| Timeframe | Focus Area | Specific Actions | Target # |
|---|---|---|---|
| Months 1-3 | Audit & Clean | Remove inactive contacts; reclassify ‘Other’ category | -50 contacts |
| Months 4-6 | Expand Policy & Nonprofit | Join 2 policy-focused LinkedIn groups; attend 1 conference | +20 contacts |
| Months 7-9 | Deepen Tech & Healthcare | Connect with alumni in target companies; engage thought leaders | +45 contacts |
| Months 10-12 | Thought Leadership | Publish 3 LinkedIn articles; speak at 1 conference | +30 contacts |
Narrative interpretation:
Identification of gaps:
Structural implications:
Problem: Students accept their current network without critical analysis
Solution: Force the comparison—ask “Compared to whom?” and “For what goal?”
Problem: Not distinguishing between strong ties, weak ties, and dormant ties
Solution: While LinkedIn data doesn’t show tie strength, reflect on: How many of your contacts would respond if you messaged them today?
Problem: Focusing on total number of connections rather than strategic positioning
Solution: Emphasize network architecture (diversity, brokerage potential) over network size
Problem: Treating network analysis as a one-time exercise
Solution: Frame this as a repeatable diagnostic students can run annually
Problem: Copy-pasting AI outputs without critical thinking
Solution: Every AI-generated insight must be interrogated: “Why does the AI recommend this? Does this align with network theory? Does this fit MY goals?”
Solution: This is normal (people change jobs, leave fields blank). Focus analysis on contacts with complete data. Reflect on why so many are unknown—recent connections? Network decay?
Solution: Spot-check AI’s NAICS/GICS codes against official sources (census.gov, msci.com).
Solution: Not inherently! Depends on your goals. Deep sector expertise vs. cross-industry brokerage are different strategies. Analyze the opportunity cost of your current structure.
Solution: Research 3-5 people in roles you aspire to. Look at their LinkedIn profiles (if public). Reverse-engineer their network composition.
Are you positioned to bridge across industries?
| Concept | Application to LinkedIn Analysis |
|---|---|
| Information diversity | Homogeneous networks = redundant information |
| Career mobility | Network composition predicts job search success |
| Risk exposure | Over-concentration = vulnerability to industry downturns |
Help me clean and analyze my LinkedIn Contacts. To clean: 1) Clean names
of special characters; 2) Normalize Company names. To analyze: 1) count
the number of contacts per Company and provide the top 5 companies with
the most contacts; 2) look up the top 10 companies and research what
industries; 3) count the unique job types by the number of contacts and
provide the top 5
Show industry sectors for top 10 companies using official NAICS and GICS
classification systems.
Generate a complete list of all unique normalized companies and their
respective sectors. Provide as a downloadable CSV.
Create a visual summary (e.g., pie chart of sector distribution). Enhance
the mapping with official NAICS/GICS codes for top companies. Provide
insights on sector trends in my network.
As a [YOUR SPECIFIC ROLE/GOAL] what would be the ideal composition of
contacts across industries? Provide recommended % distribution and rationale.
Create a visual comparison showing my current vs ideal network composition.
Provide actionable recommendations including: which sectors to expand,
specific companies and roles to target, LinkedIn strategies, and a
12-month network growth roadmap.
By the end of this assignment, you should be able to answer:
Document Version: 1.0
Last Updated: December 2025
Course: Leading by Design - People Analytics
Diagnostic
Institution: Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School
of Business
Social Capital Theory
Networks as strategic assets
Network Composition
Strategic Networking