Topic 14
Rights

Definition: a right is something for which one can demand or enforce compliance (Robert Nozick).

TYPES OF LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE RIGHTS

These are changeable by new amendments, such as Amendment XIV (equal protection of the laws) and Amendments XV, XIX, and XXVI (voting)….
….. and by Court interpretation, such as Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education on equal protection. Voting Rights Act of 1965, and 1982 amendments.
Higher Education Act of 1972 (Title IX)
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1988
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

These are changeable by Court interpretation, and by new legislation. (Ex. Grove City v. Bell and Civil Rights Restoration Act.)


WHAT KINDS OF THINGS SHOULD BE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?

Consider the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

1. Integrity of the person: yes. Amendment IV: no unreasonable searches and seizures. Amendment VIII: no cruel and unusual punishments. (See Economist on the death penalty, May 15, 1999, pp. 95-97: "Capital punishment has been abolished by all of the big democracies except the US, Japan and India. ... In the past three decades the international movement to abolish the death penalty has scored the kind of victories which slavery opponents took much longer to achieve more than a century ago."

According to Amnesty International: 1,625 executions in 1998; 80% were in China (1,067) Congo (100), the US (68), and Iran (66). Almost all countries that have abolished it have done so in spite of public support for capital punishment.

2. Civil and political liberty: yes. Amendment I: free exercise of religion, speech, assembly, petition for redress of grievances.

3. Basic human needs. No. (Why? And what do you think?)

1.  The right to bear arms: Amendment II. (What did the framers intend?}

2.  Defendants rights. Amendments IV,V,VI,VII.VIII. (In many countries without an Anglo-American tradition of law, the defendant is presumed guilty until proven innocent, rather than vice versa.)
 

CHANGING CONCEPTIONS OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

The Supreme Court said that this protection was only against the federal government, and not against state governments. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy RR v. Chicago (1897), almost 30 years later, was the first case that supported fair payment for private property against a state government.

Cases are still being decided regarding selective incorporation, as late as 1994. (See Light, Box 14-1, pp. 584-585 for longer list.)