The Legality of Enron's Business Practices
 
One of the recurring claims about Enron’s business practices is that it created an intricate web of partnerships which it kept off their main books thereby hiding their large corporate debt and making the company look more profitable and secure than it actually was. In this section, the legality of such accounting and other violations of the law by Enron is surveyed.
 
"Enron got partnership warning in ’99 -- Top company official began sounding alarm, was rebuffed" By John R. Emshwiller, The Wall Street Journal, March 18, 2001:
http://www.fairopinions.com/news/index.asp?id=129841
 
 
Off Balance Sheet--and Out of Control” about SPEs:
http://myphlip1.pearsoncmg.com/student/mpviewce.cfm?vceid=3017&vbcid=3463
 
Cozy Partnerships Shouldn't Mean Blurry Ethics -- In a world of partnerships, joint ventures, and special-purpose entities, it's tempting to play with the rules of accounting. Bad idea.” By Thomas A. Stewart, Business 2.0, March 07, 2002:
lhttp://www.business2.com/b2/web/articles/0,17863,514567,00.html
 
In the above article, the accounting requirements which are referred to as “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” is pointed to as a necessary obligation of auditing practice. To learn more about this go to:
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gaap.asp
 
And there is more at the US Securities and Exchange Commission where it states that:
 
“The federal securities laws require most publicly held companies to file with the SEC financial statements prepared under a set of accounting conventions called "Generally Accepted Accounting Principles," or "GAAP," that are accurate, truthful and complete.”