World History 79-104

Sections Y & Z

Paper Two (3 pages)

Due at the beginning of class Wednesday, March 10, 1999

Discuss the following issue, in a three-page paper (500-800 words):

Evaluate how two theories (Wallerstein's World Economy and modernization theory) concerning historical change during the early modern period account for the changes in Russia during the period. Does one theory explain changes in Russia better than the other? Are there important aspects of Russia's development that neither theory is able to explain? Compare the two theories, quoting relevant passages from the theories’ summaries, as well as from the readings on Russia.

Readings: Wallerstein World Economy handout, Modernization handout, documents and textbook on Russia.

POLICIES (see also page one of the syllabus):

Make sure not to copy anyone else's paper or use ideas without correctly attributing them. When you use ideas or evidence from the readings, cite them clearly and fully. Improperly cited papers will harm your argument and your grade. A proper citation includes at least document title, and page number, for example: "Conditions of Women in Islam, Byzantine Christianity, and Western Christianity" in World History in Documents, p. 129. If there is a clear author, include her or his name at the front of your citation. Copied papers will result in a failing grade.

Please turn your paper in on time. Papers will lose one-third of a grade for each day they are late. Weekends count as one day. Do not shrink your text to smaller than 12 point, and remember to double-space your paper so I can write clearly between lines.

Be sure to look at the syllabus for my policies on citation and writing, which include an appropriate citation style and other specific points of advice. I will accept rough drafts of the paper up to Friday, March 5.

GRADING CRITERIA:

Minimum requirements for:

C: An honest attempt to answer the question.

B: Clear, relevant comparisons between the two civilizations which employ cited passages for both parts of the comparison. These comparisons should produce a logical, well-defended argument.

A: An "A" paper will demonstrate creative, well-reasoned thinking and thorough analysis of the primary sources. The paper will consist of a strong, well-written argument without grammatical or spelling errors.