Return to Facilities Home Page

Carnegie Mellon

The Departement of
PHYSICS

  High Energy X-ray Diffraction Microscopy:
Seeing microstructure inside of bulk materials


Al1050_z6
Internal layer of aluminum polycrystal measured with x-ray diffraction microscopy at the
Advanced Photon Source (
R.M. Suter, C.M. Hefferan, S.F. Li, D. Hennessy, C. Xiao, U. Lienert, B. Tieman, refence 1 below):
Colors correspond to different lattice orientations
Circle indicates 1mm nominal sample size
Hexagon indicates simulated region used in reconstruction





Table of Contents (modified July 2008)

  1. Recent publications
  2. Examples of reconstructions
  3. Overview
  4. Technique summary and schematic
  5. Apparatus at the APS
  6. The July 2004 crew

Return to top


Related Publications

  1. Probing Microstructure Dynamics With X-ray Diffraction Microscopy, R.M. Suter, C.M. Hefferan, S.F. Li, D. Hennessy, C. Xiao, U. Lienert, B. Tieman, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 130, 021007 (2008); proceedings of the Materials Processing Defects-5 conference, Cornell University, July 2007).
  2. 3-Dimensional Characterization of Polycrystalline Bulk Materials Using High-Energy Synchrotron Radiation, U. Lienert, J. Almer, B. Jakobsen, W. Pantleon, H.F. Poulsen, D. Hennessy, C. Xiao, and R.M. Suter, Materials Science Forum 539-543, 2353-2358 (2007).

  3. Forward Modeling Method for Microstructure Reconstruction Using X-ray Diffraction Microscopy: Single Crystal Verification, R.M. Suter, D. Hennessy, C. Xiao, U. Lienert.  Reviews of Scientific Instruments, 77, 123905 (2006).
  4. Tracking: a method for structural characterization of grains in powders or polycrystals, E.M. Laurdisen, S. Schmidt, R.M. Suter, and H.F. Poulsen, J. Appl. Cryst., 34, 744-750 (2001).

  5. Three-dimensional maps of grain boundaries and the stess state of individual grains in polycrystals and powders, H.F. Poulsen, S.F. Nielsen, E.M. Laurdisen, S. Schmidt, R.M. Suter, U. Lienert, L. Margulies, T. Lorentzen, and D. Juul Jensen, J. Appl. Cryst., 34, 751-756 (2001).

  6. Future Trends: Texture Analysis for Structure-Sensitive Properties, B.L. Adams, D. Juul Jensen, H.F. Poulsen, and R. Suter, Materials Science Forum, 273-275, 29-40 (1998).


Return to top

Some examples of microstructure measurements using x-ray diffraction microscopy

All data shown here were collected at the Advanced Photon Source, beamline 1-ID at Argonne National Laboratory. Participants include Chris Hefferan, Frankie Li, Robert Suter (CMU) and Ulrich Lienert (APS). Important computational assistance was provided by Brian Tieman of the APS; analysis was performed using custom software developed at CMU running on a 68 node cluster at the APS.

This work was supported primarily by the MRSEC program of the National Science Foundation under Award Number DMR-0520425. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.

With questions or comments, e-mail R.M. Suter at suter@andrew.cmu.edu

1. A section through the middle of a NIST certified 152 micron diameter single crystal ruby sphere.  a) The color map on the left shows misorientations from the average orientation.  Red-green-blue color contributions are proportional to the Rodrigues vector describing the misorientation.  The maximum rotation angle is 0.3 degrees. The green circle shows the nominal 152 micron sample cross-section while the hexagon shows the entire region included in the analysis. The maximum radial deviations are roughly 8 microns. b) The map on the right shows the 'confidence' fitting paramter indicating maximal overlap of the simulation with the experimental data in the central region and reduced overlap near the edges. This reduction is due to background subtraction removing weak edges of the imaged diffraction spots. This fit is based on simulation of 1118 ruby Bragg peaks about 115 of which could be observed at more than one detector distance in the experimental data set. A confidence of 0.79 means that over 90 simulated peaks overlap experimentally observed peaks; 0.33 confidence implies 38 overlaps.

ruby_z5_f5      ruby_z5_f5_confidence
         



2. Near surface sections through an aluminum 1050 alloy polycrystal sample.
Colors indicate grain orientations, again coded by Rodrigues vector components. The blue circle indicates the 1 mm nominal sample diameter while the hexagon is the analysis box. Black lines in the maps are draw between elements with more than 5 degree misorientation.

 

                                          z = 0                                                             z = -10um

Al_ebsd_z1  Al_ebsd_z3

  Al_ebsd_mis


Return to top


Overview

Polycrystals are aggregates of single crystals joined together by a network of internal interfaces called grain boundaries. Polycrystalline materials, in both single and multi-phase forms, are ubiquitous in engineered systems: integrated circuits, aircraft and automotive components, communications devices, machine tools, and many others. The three dimensional geometry, arrangement, and relative orientation of the grains and the consequent grain boundary network (i.e., the microstructure) are crucial determinants of mechanical, chemical, thermal, and electrical properties. While there has been dramatic progress made in gaining three dimensional information about microstructure from two dimensional measurements made at surfaces, (CMU MRSEC) it remains a great challenge to be able to watch microstructural evolution in response to external stimuli. With such observations made deep inside bulk materials, we should be able to deepen our understanding of phenomena and develop accurate constitutive relations governing the evolution and thereby learn how to tailor microstructures to specific applications.

Three Dimensional X-ray Diffraction Microscopy (see articles listed above and the monograph by H.F. Poulsen, "Three Dimensional X-ray Diffraction Microscopy," Springer, 2004) is the only method on the horizon that can non-destructively image macroscopic volumes of internal microstructures. Based simply on Bragg diffraction, it is as versatile as, for example, electron backscatter diffraction analysis of surface microstructures. But by using high energy x-rays, it looks through millimeters of m material. Similar to serial sectioning work, measurements are done layer-by-layer. However, after the measurement, the sample still exists and can be re-measured after processing. Real-time dynamics can be monitored. The x-rays can penetrate sample chambers, making in-situ measurements possible. In sum, three dimensional x-ray diffraction microscopy promises to open up the world of microstructure dynamics and response to a new light. In combination with powerful new computational tools, one can look forward to a new level of understanding and a new level of "dynamic three dimensional command over materials structure," (ONR BAA 04-024) processing, and properties.

As a part of CMU's Mesoscale Interface Mapping Project (MIMP) (sponsored by the NSF MRSEC program) we are working to develop a facility for x-ray diffraction microscopy at the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory. We are specifically working to advance the state of non-destructive 3D microstructure mapping using high energy x-rays.



Return to top


Schematic and Outline of the Technique

  1. White (multi-wavelength) synchrotron radiation from an undulator source enters the experimental enclosure.

  2. Bragg diffraction from a bent single crystal of silicon (in transmission) is used to generate a convergent monochromatic beam (50 -100keV) of x-rays.

  3. The line focused high energy beam (red) illuminates a ~1 micron thick section of the sample (green).

  4. Bragg spots (black) from individual grains are imaged on a CCD detector (gray); spots have the shape of the illuminated grain cross section projected onto the detector plane at the scattering angle.

  5. Measuring a set of spots at multiple sample-to-detector distances yields the path of the diffracted beam and, by inversion, the position of the diffracting grain.

  6. Step-wise measurements over a range of sample orientations, omega, yield multiple spots from each grain; this implies complete crystallographic orientation information and projected images of each grain from multiple points of view.

Schematic

  1. After image processing, our analysis code performs a simulation of the entire measurement and microstructure. The sample space is gridded and the crystallographic (or chemical) phase and orientation at each grid element is adjusted to optimize the overlap of simulated Bragg scattering with the experimental data.


Return to top

Apparatus at APS beamline XOR-1

The following images were taken during our January 2008 beam time:

Sample stage Sample stage at 1-IDB.
  • CCD camera lens collects scintillation light off a 45 degree mirror.
  • Ce/YAG scintillator and 45 degree mirror holder
  • Beam block (black)
  • Sample (vertical cylinder)
  • XYZ translations stage
  • Precitech air-bearing rotation stage


Chris and Frankie  Frankie and Chris at the controls

Return to top