Manufacturing Futures Initiative

2017 Pilot Seed Grant Program

Carnegie Mellon University is anticipating a February 2017 launch of the Manufacturing Futures Initiative (MFI). MFI seeks to support interdisciplinary research aimed at accelerating the maturation of new materials and process discoveries while also helping to stimulate economic growth in the Pittsburgh Region. More details of the MFI will be announced in the coming months. In planning for a rapid startup, MFI is currently seeking research project proposals that are one-year in duration with budgeted cost per proposal between $90k to $200k (no overhead burden). Contingent on final funding approval from our initial sponsor, we expect to fund three to five proposals in this first round of projects. Relevant areas include new materials and processes, design for manufacturing, manufacturing systems and deployment, manufacturing workforce development, and manufacturing policy. Preference will be given to proposals that cross two or more of these areas, and where this short term investment may help increase the investigators' prospects of winning subsequent externally sponsored awards. Faculty should prepare a brief proposal (two-page description followed by references, plus an additional page for the budget, 12 point type) following the format below. Submissions as PI are limited to one per person (not precluding participation on other proposals). Applications are due January 6, 2016 and the awards are expected to be announced by January 30, 2017. Applications must be submitted through the dropbox widget below or at https://goo.gl/NfQGst.

- Project Summary: Provide a brief summary of the proposed activity that outlines the problem to be addressed, explains why it is important, and who will be involved in the work.

- Demonstration: Provide a brief summary of the expected outcomes that could be presented to government and corporate leaders at a Manufacturing Futures Summit in May 2018. How will these outcomes demonstrate concept viability and whether there should be further investment in the topic?

- Leverage: Discuss how a modest seed grant can lay the foundation for an expanded activity, including specific sources that will be sought for future support and indication of the long term potential for growth of this activity. Please briefly describe the closest related work currently underway at Carnegie Mellon by the team (clarifying the uniqueness of the proposed project). Also describe the prospects for matching or in-kind support that can amplify the impact of the grant.

- Impact: How would you measure "success" in your project? What is its potential for social and economic impact, including in the Greater Pittsburgh Region?

- Infrastructure: CMU is evaluating investment in an off-campus advanced manufacturing research facility with highbay facilities, lab facilities, and workforce training space that enables side-by-side R&D engagement with industry. If applicable, describe what aspects of your proposed project outcomes, if successful, would positively impact and/or leverage such a research facility?

- Budget: Provide a budget and justification appropriate for the proposed scope of work. Total budgeted cost should lie between $90k to $200k. The period of performance should be approximately one year and start after February 1, 2017 and end by August 31, 2018.

The goals of the Manufacturing Futures Initiative will be best accomplished by promoting collaboration; therefore, preference will be given to proposals that involve multiple faculty and interdisciplinary interactions (cross-college and/or interdepartmental). Priority will be given to proposals with the capacity to nucleate entirely new activities that link multiple technical areas and their corresponding experts. Proposals that are simply requesting funding to continue an existing and/or mature line of work will receive lower priority. However, integration across existing and/or relatively mature areas may be considered a new activity.

While all proposals will be treated as confidential with respect to protecting faculty ideas, we reserve the right to be proactive. For example, depending on the ideas we receive, we may approach faculty to explore possible alternative or additional collaborations when it might add valuable new perspectives to a project. We may also ask faculty to revise proposals prior to funding, based on reviewer feedback.

If accepting an award, faculty PI award recipients will be required to attend a launch workshop with manufacturing directors and regional partners and a mid-year internal workshop where they will present to each other. PIs will also be required to present their one-year demonstration projects at the MFI Summit involving industry executives and government leaders in May 2018.

Proposals will be evaluated by ad-hoc reviewers, primarily CMU faculty. Final approval of grant awardees will be made by MFI Leadership. Please contact Erica Fuchs, Professor, Engineering and Public Policy, at erhf@andrew.cmu.edu with questions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the expected balance between integrating multiple areas versus high cost of a proposal with several co-PIs? The call states the preferences quite clearly but has an actual set of criteria been worked out?

- Given that the MFI proposals are to be in the $90-200K range, reviewers will be expecting focused 1-year proposals with demonstrable achievements involving 1-2 Ph.D. students.

- Per the proposal statement, “Proposals will be evaluated by ad-hoc reviewers, primarily CMU faculty. Final approval of grant awardees will be made by MFI Leadership.”

- In terms of our criteria, please refer to the paragraph after the bullets in the call for proposals, which begins, "The goals of the Manufacturing Futures Initiative will be best accomplished by promoting collaboration; therefore, preference will be given to....”

You note that preference is given to collaborative proposals, but the call also says “Submissions as PI are limited to one per person (not precluding participation on other proposals).”

- Each proposal should have one PI, but, given the collaborative nature, one or more additional co-PIs would be typical. Each individual can only submit one proposals as the PI (lead submitter). There is no limit on the number of submissions on which an individual may participate as a co-PI.

Is utilizing the off-campus advanced manufacturing research facility mentioned in the call a criteria for funding?

- No. Using the off campus facility is NOT required or a criteria in determining winning proposals.

Is the expectation that each project will have deliverables in one year?

<>- Each submission should state its expected outcomes, as described in the “Demonstration” bullet in the call for proposals. Different projects could have wildly different outcomes that would be appropriate to expect at the end of one year in their proposed work. The submitters should help the submission reviewers understand what appropriate demonstration outcomes would be for their type of research (E.g. what metrics or outcomes would they themselves look for to determine if the research was a good direction to continue?)

Is this a one-time call for proposals?

- If the Manufacturing Futures Initiative subsequently officially launches (currently anticipated for February 2017), we would expect one or more calls per year for the next three years of equivalent or greater funding.

If you have news that the Manufacturing Futures Initiative is officially going forward already in January, are you going to expand the call or the amount awarded?

- We still expect to award 3-5 research projects that are one-year in duration with budgeted cost per proposal between $90-200K (no overhead burden) with this first call.

Can you elaborate on what you have in mind when you think about manufacturing policy?

- The focus of the proposal is funding research. We’re interested in any policy that would support the commercialization of new technologies, workforce training and development, regional economic growth.

Are they focused on local or state?

- Either could be relevant. Federal could also be relevant. If it is a new technology which requires new regulatory understanding in the FAA or FDA or DOT, for example, federal policy could be quite relevant. There are many other examples.

Where should we set the risk needle on our projects?

- A unique part of this funding is that it can fund projects that may not be able to get corporate or government funding yet (whether due to being too interdisciplinary, too early-stage or otherwise), but with some seed funding can achieve a demonstration that may reduce the risk sufficiently to attract corporate or government funding. They are looking for a spectrum of risk.

Follow up, can we get future funding from the government?

- The goal of the CFP is to support faculty in getting research off the ground that subsequently earns follow-on funding.

The advanced manufacturing infrastructure that you mention, what does it look like?

- Gary Fedder is the lead on the advanced manufacturing infrastructure investment, and the university’s assessment thereof. Early stage ideas have included approximately 30K square feet on the ground floor (with a large concrete slab already part of the building that reduces vibration) of highly instrumented building space, with approximately 50% of that space having a high bay and being made to be highly reconfigurable and the other 50% of that space being non-reconfigurable for processes with more specialized needs (ventilation, explosive or toxic materials, large equipment that can not be moved, etc.) Additional questions on the facility and any interest to engage in the current discussion should be directed to Gary Fedder at fedder@cmu.edu.

Do you want to see a one year or three year vision?

- This call for proposals will fund one-year projects. If you believe it is helpful to your one-year proposal to describe the three-year vision within the limited space, of course feel free to do so.

The spending of funds, is it limited to graduate students, or can you spend on capital equipment?

- The budget in the full grant is focused on funds for students. There are some limited funds for equipment. If we are in a contingency situation, I would expect the funds to go to graduate students

What about funds for summer salary?

- The focus of the funds are students, however, there are some funds in the budget which may be able to be used for summer salary or salary, for example, for research scientists. Also, there are certain disciplines at the university (particularly in the humanities and social sciences) where students are not the primary means of conducting research, rather funds are used by faculty to buy time away from teaching to conduct research themselves.

Is the submission limited to two pages?

- References are separate, plus an additional page for the budget.

Will faculty who participated in one or more ways in supporting the creation of the proposal that brought these funds to the university guaranteed funding?

- No. The call for proposals is university-wide and will have faculty review to support identifying the top proposals for funding.

If this does launch into a larger effort, is there an opportunity to bring people together for teaming and community building? It would be great to have a retreat.

A retreat is a great idea. We are definitely looking to engage in such community-development activities if MFI kicks off.

In addition, as noted in the call for proposals, to help develop ideas across the community, “...faculty PI award recipients will be required to attend a launch workshop with manufacturing directors and regional partners and a mid-year internal workshop where they will present to each other. PIs will also be required to present their one-year demonstration projects at the MFI Summit involving industry executives and government leaders in May 2018.”