Four skeptical arguments about knowledge .
     A. Senses
     B The madman
     C. Dreaming
     D. The evil demon

A. Senses

If instrument sometimes fails, we can never trust it in any particular case.

If in each case the senses could be in error maybe they are in error in every case
     This is mathematically possible
So maybe we don't ever get knowledge from the senses

Special cases.
     Looking into the distance
     The mirage in the desert.
          I see water on the road

I cannot doubt right now that I am seeing my hand!
That just impossible
What possible evidence could convince me?
     Could anything overrule my immediate awareness???
     We know why sometimes senses are in error
     But that doesn't show that they could always be in error
Special cases are special in obvious ways

Transition: consider people who always make mistaken sensory judgments

B The madman

Lunatics have mistaken beliefs
Perhaps I too am insane
Then I also would have no knowledge

They see a house, but call it a castle
     They see a pauper, but call her a queen

The problem lies in their lack of reason
     this what makes them incomplete persons
They cannot reason from sense experience to knowing

Transition: But there is one situation in which even rational people abandon reason. That is while dreaming
     A lunatic behaves while awake as we all do whilst dreaming

C. Dreaming

I think I see my dog
     But I am dreaming
I really see nothing

If I am dreaming, my senses do not give me knowledge

Two ways to reconstruct this argument.

1. I could be dreaming Right now
(Then I wake up and so know that I was dreaming)
     If I am dreaming, I have no knowledge
     I may have no knowledge

2. In general: No way to distinguish dreaming from waking

1 makes a weaker claim than 2. 1 allows that sometimes I know I am aware, 2 refuses to admit that
     but 1 strong enough to give conclusion

Stronger because- consider this case
     I see the table, then I wake up. After I awaken, I have knowledge. Before then I thought I had knowledge, but I was wrong

Dream experience is like real experience
But it doesn't give any perceptual knowledge
I am not seeing anything when I dream (my eyes are closed)

i.e. There are no internal criteria to distinguish dreams from waking experience

D. The evil demon

a Godlike being, but all evil.

Theology and knowledge.

God is all good
God created me
Therefore: I have knowledge

The evil demon is powerful and evil
He prevents me from having knowledge

Imagine I am writing
     I put 2, +, 2, but then the demon causes me to see 2,+, 1 and so I get 3 as sum

Or,
I see a table, but the evil demon causes me to see a house, so I believe I see a house.

Suppose this happens all the time

If evil demon exists, then I have no knowledge