Nietzsche's Perspectivism. 
  
Against Objectivity


We have only perspectives, viewpoints determined by interests
	Critical Questions. 
		Can this view be consistently stated?
		Can it be true? 
		What argument for it can be given? 

Every point of view depends upon particular interests 
Objectivity--
	if we mean a transcending all such viewpoints--
is a fiction. 

My interests differ from yours 
And so our interpretations may not overlap


There are no facts, only interpretations. 
	As we saw on p. 45, persons can be thought of as fictions. 



Descartes seeks objectivity. 
	Every reader will work through the Meditations to the same conclusion
	There is a soul, God, external world
	You discover this whatever your personal views

Nietzsche denies that arguments like that are possible. 
	So how can we consistently read Genealogy of Morals? 
That question is not easy to answer!