iCAD/CAEt
Carnegie Mellon
University

24-688: Introduction to CAD/CAE Tools

PS8   
  Fall 2013   

Home ] Course Info ] Schedule ] Showcase ] References ] Performance ]
     

 

PS8 Final                        
Total 100.0                        
Average 83.3 Question 1 Question 2        
      5   5   5.00   10   55 20 100
Codename   % Delta Von Misses Points % Delta Displacement Points % Delta Reaction Force Points % Delta improved reaction force Points Submitted? Submission Credit Analysis Setup Comments
Seattle , Washington 98 6.6% 4.67 5.3% 4.74 21.9% 3.90 42.3% 10 1 55 20 The reaction force is too low
Norfolk , Virginia 98 17.3% 4.14 11.5% 4.43 9.8% 4.51 39.7% 10 1 55 20 This is pretty close =)
Hialeah , Florida 98 19.8% 4.01 12.3% 4.39 7.5% 4.62 55.0% 10 1 55 20 Results are not listed in the summary
Honolulu CDP, Hawaii 97 36.4% 3.18 10.6% 4.47 9.8% 4.51 62.9% 10 1 55 20 Stree are too big.. Results are very far away from the sample solutions
Baltimore , Maryland 97 39.6% 3.02 18.2% 4.09 8.7% 4.57 50.2% 10 1 55 20 Very big displacements
Lincoln , Nebraska 96 8.8% 4.56 7.0% 4.65 60.1% 1.99 60.9% 10 1 55 20 Weird report format. Low reaction force
Tacoma , Washington 96 53.5% 2.33 8.2% 4.59 15.8% 4.21 34.2% 10 1 55 20 Results are very far from the sample solutions
Jacksonville , Florida 96 19.5% 4.02 4.2% 4.79 62.6% 1.87 34.9% 10 1 55 20  
Wichita , Kansas 95 53.7% 2.31 12.3% 4.39 30.6% 3.47 40.8% 10 1 55 20 Results are not listed in the summary, very big displacement
New Orleans , Louisiana 95 56.3% 2.18 3.8% 4.81 41.0% 2.95 33.8% 10 1 55 20 Values are far away from the correct solution
Cincinnati , Ohio 95 9.9% 4.51 1.1% 4.95 90.3% 0.49 66.1% 10 1 55 20 Really low reaction force
Anaheim , California 95 64.9% 1.75 8.8% 4.56 30.6% 3.47 75.0% 10 1 55 20 Weird report format. Results are far from the correct solutions
Fresno , California 95 60.2% 1.99 9.5% 4.53 37.3% 3.13 71.2% 10 1 55 20 Weird Report Format. Displacement is large
Las Vegas , Nevada 95 2.5% 4.88 5.3% 4.74 131.2% 0.00 65.0% 10 1 55 20 No summary
Arlington , Texas 95 22.6% 3.87 15.0% 4.25 70.6% 1.47 75.9% 10 1 55 20 Values are less than half of the correct solution
Buffalo , New York 94 10.5% 4.48 5.1% 4.74 94.9% 0.26 82.6% 10 1 55 20 Max force is only based on one node
Louisville , Kentucky 94 79.2% 1.04 1.0% 4.95 31.2% 3.44 55.5% 10 1 55 20 Results are very far away from the sample solutions
Los Angeles , California 94 43.2% 2.84 5.3% 4.74 68.8% 1.56 97.0% 10 1 55 20 Values are about half of the correct values
Anchorage , Alaska 94 9.9% 4.51 13.0% 4.35 96.5% 0.17 64.7% 10 1 55 20 Resultss are not listed in the summary. Negative reaction force?
Tucson , Arizona 94 146.9% 0.00 7.0% 4.65 15.6% 4.22 60.5% 10 1 55 20 Results are not listed in the summary
Oakland , California 94 2.7% 4.86 26.6% 3.67 96.0% 0.20 35.6% 10 1 55 20 Max force is only based on one node
Milwaukee , Wisconsin 94 19.8% 4.01 10.5% 4.47 96.5% 0.17 71.8% 10 1 55 20 Results are not listed in the summary. Really high reaction force
Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania 94 33.5% 3.32 0.1% 4.99 95.2% 0.24 35.7% 10 1 55 20 Max force is only based on one node
Laredo , Texas 93 62.0% 1.90 6.7% 4.67 61.4% 1.93 32.6% 10 1 55 20 Your results are very far away from the solutions
Boston , Massachusetts 93 24.3% 3.78 11.5% 4.43 95.2% 0.24 30.8% 10 1 55 20 Max force is only based on one node
San Antonio , Texas 93 29.0% 3.55 777.2% 0.00 4.0% 4.80 69.4% 10 1 55 20 Wrong displacement (didn't surpress the main body), low stress
Plano , Texas 93 39.7% 3.02 0.7% 4.96 95.4% 0.23 33.4% 10 1 55 20 Max force is only based on one node
Toledo , Ohio 93 136.7% 0.00 9.6% 4.52 29.5% 3.53 39.7% 10 1 55 20 Really high max stress.
Portland , Oregon 93 109.1% 0.00 8.3% 4.59 40.2% 2.99 42.9% 10 1 55 20 Results are very far away from the sample solutions
Virginia Beach , Virginia 93 41.2% 2.94 11.2% 4.44 97.5% 0.13 49.1% 10 1 55 20 Max force is only based on one node
Denver , Colorado 92 106.3% 0.00 7.4% 4.63 49.9% 2.51 50.0% 10 1 55 20 Values are very far away from the sample solutions
Omaha , Nebraska 92 56.8% 2.16 5.3% 4.74 97.8% 0.11 53.2% 10 1 55 20 Max force is only based on one node
Raleigh , North Carolina 92 80.2% 0.99 43.2% 2.84 43.4% 2.83 57.1% 10 1 55 20 Weird report format. Really small displacement
Austin , Texas 92 66.3% 1.68 5.3% 4.73 97.2% 0.14 99.9% 10 1 55 20 Max force is only based on one node
Sacramento , California 92 57.4% 2.13 15.8% 4.21 96.5% 0.18 41.0% 10 1 55 20 Results are not listed in the summary. Max force is measured at a node
Tampa , Florida 91 146.3% 0.00 9.3% 4.54 70.4% 1.48 64.0% 10 1 55 20  
Atlanta , Georgia 90 79.4% 1.03 15.2% 4.24 97.1% 0.15 84.3% 10 1 55 20 Max force is only based on one node
San Francisco , California 90 93.8% 0.31 10.5% 4.47 97.0% 0.15 46.2% 10 1 55 20 Values are very far away from what they are supposed to be. Max force is only based on one node.
Cleveland , Ohio 90 100.0% 0.00 7.0% 4.65 99.8% 0.01 31.3% 10 1 55 20 No max Von Misses Stress. Really small max force?
Kansas , Missouri 90 75.7% 1.22 100.0% 0.00 33.7% 3.31 73.8% 10 1 55 20 No displacement
Jersey , New Jersey 89 100.7% 0.00 12.3% 4.39 141.3% 0.00 38.0% 10 1 55 20 Your results are very far away from the solutions
Fort Wayne , Indiana 88 54.8% 2.26 640.4% 0.00 76.3% 1.18 66.8% 10 1 55 20 Displacement of 21.1 mm? Max force is only based on one node
St. Petersburg , Florida 86 2.9% 4.86 2.5% 4.88 72.8% 1.36 ###### 0 1 55 20 Increased reaction force in the new design? Values are very far away from the correct solutions
Phoenix , Arizona 86 53.0% 2.35 5.5% 4.72 24.6% 3.77 28.5% 0 1 55 20 Some values are about half of the correct values
Indianapolis, Indiana 86 48.1% 2.59 8.8% 4.56 30.6% 3.47 29.2% 0 1 55 20  
Stockton , California 85 100.0% 0.00 777.2% 0.00 97.1% 0.14 100.0% 10 1 55 20 Wrong displacement (did not surpress the part while measuring), wrong units, no max stress. Results are not listed in summary. Max force is measured at a point only
Dallas , Texas 85 370.5% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 98.6% 0.07 41.0% 10 1 55 20 No data in speed. Your stresses seem a little too big. Max force only taken from one node.
Mesa , Arizona 85 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 98.7% 0.07 100.0% 10 1 55 20 No new design, weird report format. Results are not listed in the summary. Max force calculated on one node
Baton Rouge , Louisiana 84 53.0% 2.35 4.2% 4.79 61.5% 1.93 2.2% 0 1 55 20  
St. Louis , Missouri 82 40.9% 2.96 11.9% 4.40 99.5% 0.03 ###### 0 1 55 20 Results are not listed in the summary, no graph. Max force is measured on a node only. Increased force in new design?
Santa Ana , California 82 50.6% 2.47 8.9% 4.55 97.6% 0.12 29.0% 0 1 55 20 Max force is only based on one node
Fremont , California 81 78.7% 1.07 12.6% 4.37 79.5% 1.03 -96.5% 0 1 55 20 Values are very far away from the sample solutions. Increased reaction force in the new design?
Washington , DC 81 53.4% 2.33 27.7% 3.61 93.9% 0.30 ###### 0 1 55 20 Increased reaction force in the new design? Values are very far away from the correct solutions
El Paso , Texas 81 4.2% 4.79 514.0% 0.00 75.8% 1.21 -19.4% 0 1 55 20 Results are not listed in the summary, no graph. Max force is measured on a node only at the case. Displacement is measured with the main body.
Minneapolis , Minnesota 80 50.9% 2.45 95.1% 0.25 45.7% 2.72 ###### 0 1 55 20 Force increased after modification? Really small displacement
Glendale , Arizona 78 35.8% 3.21 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 0.0% 0 1 55 20 No data on displacements and forces. Summary doesn't contain all the data required
Columbus , Ohio 75 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 0.0% 0 1 55 20 No submission
St. Paul , Minnesota 55 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 0.0% 0 1 55 0 No working result
Riverside , California 55 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 0.0% 0 1 55 0 No working result
Memphis , Tennessee 0 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 0.0% 0 0 0 0 No submission
Corpus Christi , Texas 0 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 0.0% 0 0 0 0 No submission
Long Beach , California 0 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 0.0% 0 0 0 0 No working result
Charlotte , North Carolina 0 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 100.0% 0.00 0.0% 0 0 0 0 No submission

 

Home ] Course Info ] Schedule ] Showcase ] References ] Performance ]


Send email to Professor Kenji Shimada ( shimada @ cmu.edu)
with questions or comments about this web site.