|
PS10 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
100.0 |
15.0 |
5.0 |
40 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
Average |
89.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Codename |
|
Setups |
Formats |
Report 1 |
Report 2 |
Late Time |
Late penalty factor (1.0 / 0.7 / 0.4 /
0) |
Comments (Missing things -2 ; Wrong
things -1 ) |
|
San Francisco , California |
100 |
15 |
5 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
|
|
Milwaukee , Wisconsin |
100 |
15 |
5 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
|
|
Anchorage , Alaska |
100 |
15 |
5 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
|
|
Portland , Oregon |
100 |
15 |
5 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
|
|
Wichita , Kansas |
100 |
15 |
5 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
|
|
Tucson , Arizona |
100 |
15 |
5 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
|
|
Plano , Texas |
99 |
15 |
4 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
|
|
Las Vegas , Nevada |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
contours show wrong time step |
|
Columbus , Ohio |
99 |
15 |
4 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
no summary |
|
Denver , Colorado |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
|
|
Tampa , Florida |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
|
|
Cincinnati , Ohio |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
For aluminum, reaction F is alittle bit
too small |
|
Atlanta , Georgia |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Mesa , Arizona |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
R1: reaction force is small |
|
Baltimore , Maryland |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
|
|
Lincoln , Nebraska |
99 |
15 |
4 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
no summary |
|
Washington , DC |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
Reaction force too small |
|
Stockton , California |
99 |
15 |
5 |
40 |
39 |
|
1 |
Reaction force too small, min. |
|
Louisville , Kentucky |
99 |
15 |
5 |
40 |
39 |
|
1 |
min. sft factor is at wrong step |
|
Seattle , Washington |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
Reaction force is too small |
|
Sacramento , California |
99 |
15 |
4 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
No summary |
|
Austin , Texas |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
Reaction force is too small |
|
Dallas , Texas |
99 |
15 |
4 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
No value result in summary |
|
San Antonio , Texas |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
Reaction force is too small |
|
St. Petersburg , Florida |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
Reaction force is too small |
|
St. Louis , Missouri |
99 |
15 |
4 |
40 |
40 |
|
1 |
No summary |
|
Minneapolis , Minnesota |
99 |
15 |
5 |
40 |
39 |
|
1 |
steel reaction force is too small |
|
Anaheim , California |
99 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
Reaction force is a bit too small. |
|
Kansas , Missouri |
98 |
15 |
4 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
no summary |
|
Cleveland , Ohio |
98 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
39 |
|
1 |
Reaction force too small |
|
Indianapolis, Indiana |
98 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
39 |
|
1 |
Reaction force too small |
|
Los Angeles , California |
98 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
39 |
|
1 |
Reaction force too small |
|
Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania |
98 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
39 |
|
1 |
R1:too small Reaction F; R2: too small
Safety F |
|
Santa Ana , California |
98 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
39 |
|
1 |
R1:too small Reaction F; R2: too small
Safety F |
|
Fremont , California |
98 |
15 |
4 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
no summary, min. safety factor graph
pattern, |
|
Oakland , California |
98 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
39 |
|
1 |
Safety factor graph is not correct |
|
Laredo , Texas |
98 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
39 |
|
1 |
Reaction force is too small |
|
Honolulu CDP, Hawaii |
98 |
15 |
4 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
No value result in summary, aluminum
reaction force is too much |
|
Jacksonville , Florida |
97 |
13 |
5 |
39 |
40 |
|
1 |
constrain nodes instead of surfaces |
|
St. Paul , Minnesota |
97 |
15 |
4 |
39 |
39 |
|
1 |
no summary, contour presentations are
not correct on time step |
|
Boston , Massachusetts |
97 |
15 |
5 |
38 |
39 |
|
1 |
R1:small reaction F, safety factor
presentation should be on linkage. |
|
Arlington , Texas |
97 |
15 |
5 |
38 |
39 |
|
1 |
displacement contours show wrong time
step, reaction F to small for R1 |
|
Fresno , California |
97 |
15 |
5 |
37 |
40 |
|
1 |
Reaction force is a bit too small.Min.
sft factor contour is not showing well. |
|
Baton Rouge , Louisiana |
96 |
15 |
5 |
38 |
38 |
|
1 |
wrong time step presentations of
contours |
|
Toledo , Ohio |
96 |
15 |
4 |
38 |
39 |
|
1 |
Displacement graph is not correct,
reaction force too small, no summary |
|
Raleigh , North Carolina |
96 |
15 |
4 |
37 |
40 |
|
1 |
No value result in summary, reaction
force is too small, displacement contour is not showing well |
|
Norfolk , Virginia |
96 |
14 |
4 |
40 |
38 |
|
1 |
No summary.Material is not
correct.Steel: displacement presentation not showing well |
|
Phoenix , Arizona |
95 |
13 |
5 |
38 |
39 |
|
1 |
Information like Linkage settings, pin
settings missing in reports; |
|
Jersey , New Jersey |
95 |
15 |
5 |
37 |
38 |
|
1 |
Reaction force is too small, min. sft
factor graph is wrong |
|
Riverside , California |
94 |
13 |
5 |
37 |
39 |
|
1 |
no safety factor contour in report 1,
link material is still Aluminum in report 2 |
|
Omaha , Nebraska |
94 |
15 |
4 |
37 |
38 |
|
1 |
no summary, too small reaction F,
presentaions are at wrong time step |
|
Fort Wayne , Indiana |
90 |
15 |
5 |
35 |
35 |
|
1 |
presentations are in wrong time step |
|
Virginia Beach , Virginia |
90 |
15 |
4 |
35 |
36 |
|
1 |
no summary, no contour presetations
required.. |
|
New Orleans , Louisiana |
90 |
15 |
5 |
35 |
35 |
|
1 |
Simulation stops at 0.8s, presentations
are in wrong time step |
|
Hialeah , Florida |
90 |
15 |
4 |
36 |
35 |
|
1 |
No result value in summary, contour
presentation is not on specified parts, min. factor graph |
|
Glendale , Arizona |
89 |
15 |
5 |
34 |
35 |
|
1 |
presentations are in wrong time step,
no max. displacement graph, steel simulation stops at 1.6s |
|
Buffalo , New York |
89 |
15 |
5 |
39 |
30 |
|
1 |
Reaction force is too small.Steel
simulation: all the presentations are missing in report |
|
Long Beach , California |
76 |
14 |
0 |
31 |
31 |
2 |
1 |
Wrong file formats, no presenations
requirements 2-5 |
|
El Paso , Texas |
75 |
15 |
0 |
30 |
30 |
|
1 |
|
|
Memphis , Tennessee |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
No files submited |
|
Corpus Christi , Texas |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
No files submied |
|
Charlotte , North Carolina |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
No submission |
|
Tacoma , Washington |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
No submission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|